Microbial Features and Qualitative Detection of Adulteration along with Physicochemical Characteristics of Sweetened Yoghurt

Main Article Content

Md. Ashikur Rahman
Arzina Hossain
Mahfuza Islam
Md. Shakhwat Hussain
Roksana Huque


Background and Objective: Food adulteration is of major public health concern worldwide. The food safety situation in Bangladesh is at an alarming stage due to food adulteration, microbiological contamination and fraudulence. Consumption of milk and milk product are increasing because of their health benefit effect. However, milk and milk products are being currently adulterated by substituting ingredients with cheaper materials. The aim of this study was the qualitative detection of adulterants along with physico-chemical and microbial features of sweetened yoghurt.

Methodology: Sixteen sweetened yoghurt samples (Ten locally available and six commercial brands) were collected from different area in Bangladesh. All the sweetened yoghurt samples were subjected to urea, starch, ammonium sulphate, hydrogen peroxide analyses. Physico-chemical analysis of sweetened yoghurt was also done. Moreover, yoghurt samples were also microbiologically assessed.

Results: Acidity content of all sweetened yoghurt was found to be ranges from 0.66 ±.05% to 0.77±0.05 which was lower than the standard level of (0.8 to1.2). In both cases (Commercial) branded and (Local) unbranded yoghurt had lower moisture content and higher total solid content compared to standard level (13.5%). Those measurements indicated that sweetened yoghurt samples were adulterated with starch. Meanwhile, both branded and unbranded sweetened yoghurt samples had fat contents ranging between 1.56 ±0.09% to 2.63 ±0.2% which were below the standard level (3%). On the other hand, protein content ranged between 3.71±0.02% to 4.33±0.15%, which was higher than standard level of 3.2%. These results revealed that all sweetened yoghurt samples were highly adulterated with urea, starch and ammonium sulphate. From the microbiological point of view, all sweetened yoghurt samples had good quality. For instance, L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus were found to be under acceptable range, and there were no pathogenic coliform bacteria were found in any of the samples.

Conclusion: Results obtained from this study might help the consumers to be more aware when they purchase yoghurt from local market.

Sweetened yogurt, adulteration, physico-chemical characteristic, microbiological quality

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, M. A., Hossain, A., Islam, M., Hussain, M. S., & Huque, R. (2020). Microbial Features and Qualitative Detection of Adulteration along with Physicochemical Characteristics of Sweetened Yoghurt. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 12(4), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i430214
Original Research Article


Durga LC, Sharda D, Sastry MP. Effect of storage conditions on keeping quality, riboflavin and niacin of plan and fruit yoghurts. Ind J Dairy Sci. 1986;39:404-409.

Stocklin P. Cul. Dairy Production. J. 1969; 46:6.

Shahani KM, Chandan RC. Nutritional and healthful aspects of cultured and culture- containing dairy foods. Journal of Dairy Science. 1979;62(10):1685.

Mann GV, Spoerry A. Studies of a Surfactant and Cholesteremia in the Maasai. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1974;27:464-469.

Kamthania M, Saxena J, Saxena K, Sharma DK. Methods of Detection &Remedial Measures. Int J Engg Tech Res. 2014;1:15–20.

Ellis DI, Brewster VL, Dunn WB, Allwood JW, Golovanov AP, Goodacre R. Fingerprinting food: current technologies for the detection of food adulteration and contamination. Chem Soc Rev. 2012; 41(17):5706–27.

Marcus IA. Disease prevention in America: From a local to a national outlook, 1880-1910. Bull History Med. 1979;53:184-203.

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis (17thedn), Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Washington D.C; 2002.

Aggarwala AC, Sharma RM. A laboratory Manual of Milk Inspection. (4thedn) Asia Publishing House, New Delhi, India; 1961.

International Dairy Federation (IDF). Determination of nitrogen content (Kjeldahl method) and calculation of protein content. Provisional International IDF Stan- dard 20A, Brussels; 1986.

Food Safety & Standard Authority of India (FSSAI), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India New Delhi manual of methods of analysis of foods (milk &milk products); 2012.

James G. Cappuccino, Natalie Sherman, Microbiology; A Laboratory Manual, 7th Edition; 2008.

Castandeda FC, De Hombre MR, Rajas CI. Effect of heat treatment as firmness of yogurt made from buffalo milk. Revista Cubana de Alimentaciony Nutrition. 1991; 5(2):114- 117.
[CABED Abst. 193-94]

Indian standard: Dairy products-yoghurt-specification, IS 1289; 1989.

(Reaffirmed 1999).

Younus S, Masud T, Aziz T. Quality Evaluation of Market Yoghurt /Dahi. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2002;1(5): 226-230.

Rashid MH, Miyamoto T. Quality evaluation of traditional fermented milk “Dahi” in Bangladesh. Milk Science. 2005.54(1): 29-36.

Sharma R, Rajput YS, Barui AK, NLN. Detection of adulterants in milk, A laboratory manual. In N. D. R. Institute (Ed.)). Karnal-132001, Haryana, India; 2012.

Singh P, Gandhi N. Milk preservatives and adulterants: processing, regulatory and safety issues. Food Rev Int. 2015;31(3): 236–61.

Singuluri H, Sukumaran M. Milk adulteration in Hyderabad, India – a comparative study on the levels of different adulterants present in milk. J Chromatograph Separat Techniq. 2014;5: 212.

Kandpal SD, Srivastava AK, Negi KS. Estimation of quality of raw milk (open & branded) by milk adulteration testing kit. Indian J Community Health. 2012;24:3.

National Yogurt Association (NYA) Cultures for Life.

Aziz T. Thermal processing of Dahi to improve its keeping quality. Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetitics. 1986;22:80-87.