Compositional Analysis of Coconut Milk–Finger Millet Milk-Based Non-Dairy Ice Cream: Proximate Constituents and Mineral Distribution

Abhishek R. Ranvare

Department of Dairy Technology, Warner College of Dairy Technology (WCDT), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Avinash Singh *

Department of Dairy Technology, Warner College of Dairy Technology (WCDT), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Antia Gautam

Department of Dairy Microbiology, Warner College of Dairy Technology (WCDT), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Sandeep G.M. Prasad

Department of Dairy Engineering, Warner College of Dairy Technology (WCDT), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Puneet Arora

Department of Dairy Technology, Warner College of Dairy Technology (WCDT), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Suvartan Ranveer

Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS), Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Vidya Patil

Department of Food Technology, Yashavantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara, Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil University, Satara, Maharashtra, India.

Ganesh Patil

Sankalp Science and Technology Research, Rashin, Maharashtra, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate conventional and plant-based ice cream formulations using coconut milk and germinated finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) milk, with particular emphasis on their physicochemical properties, proximate composition, mineral distribution and sensory acceptability. Four formulations were investigated: a conventional buffalo milk-based control, T1 (coconut milk-based formulation without finger millet milk), T2 (coconut milk and finger millet milk blend; 273:189 g) and T3 (coconut milk and finger millet milk blend; 156:312 g). The finger millet grains were soaked for 6–8 h, germinated for 24 h and processed to obtain millet milk. The formulations were evaluated for physicochemical characteristics, proximate constituents, mineral composition and sensory attributes using a nine-point hedonic scale. The results indicated a progressive decrease in pH (6.80 to 6.12), total soluble solids (36.00 to 25.00 °Brix) and overrun (75.00 to 49.00%) from the control to T3. Protein and total fat contents ranged from 2.50 to 3.70% and 9.80 to 13.00%, respectively. Among the experimental formulations, T3 exhibited the highest dietary fibre (1.50%), phosphorus (65.00 mg/100 g), magnesium (30.00 mg/100 g) and iron (1.10 mg/100 g), together with the lowest sodium concentration (44.00 mg/100 g). Sensory evaluation revealed that T1 achieved the highest overall acceptability score (8.50 ± 0.22) among the experimental formulations, followed by T2 (7.50 ± 0.28) and T3 (6.00 ± 0.35), whereas the conventional control recorded 9.00 ± 0.18. Thus, T1 demonstrated superior sensory acceptability among the plant-based formulations, while T3 exhibited advantages in selected nutritional parameters. The findings highlight the formulation-dependent trade-off between sensory acceptance and nutritional composition in coconut milk-based non-dairy ice cream incorporating germinated finger millet milk.

Keywords: Coconut milk, germination, germinated finger millet, plant-based ice cream, nutritional composition, non-dairy frozen dessert, mineral composition


How to Cite

Ranvare, Abhishek R., Avinash Singh, Antia Gautam, Sandeep G.M. Prasad, Puneet Arora, Suvartan Ranveer, Vidya Patil, and Ganesh Patil. 2026. “Compositional Analysis of Coconut Milk–Finger Millet Milk-Based Non-Dairy Ice Cream: Proximate Constituents and Mineral Distribution”. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety 18 (11):190-202. https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2026/v18i112196.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.